Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Next »

Metadata Set

Date

Activity

Status Update(s)

Owner(s)

2020/04/20

Version 0.2 of Metadata based on telecon revisions

2020/04/21

Added Metadata revisions to spreadsheet

2020/04/23

Updated Spreadsheet based on group call;

Revised metamodel

2020/04/27

Updated Spreadsheet based on group call

2020/04/29

Revised metamodel graphic source and PDF.

 

2020/04/29

Updated Spreadsheet based on group call; revised metamodel graphic source and PDF.

2020/04/30

Updated Spreadsheet based on call

2020/05/01

Updated spreadsheet with Jane’s contribution and comments

2020/05/04

Updated spreadsheet from call

2020/05/06

Updated spreadsheet from call

2020/05/07

Updated Spreadsheet with Laura’s additions

2020/05/08

Revised metamodel graphic source and PDF

Model Comments

Comment/suggestion

Rationale (if necessary)

Submitter

Adjudication

Consider looking at Dublin Core metadata standard

We’re a standards organization…

Jane Shellum

 

Consider changing “area of interest” to “subject”

“subject” may be a more accurate description of what the metadata is capturing. And this is one element from Dublin Core

Jane Shellum

 

Consider breaking down Area of interest into groups. E.g Care Setting (inpatient, outpatient, emergency, long-term care, home, telemedicine), Special Populations (children, pregnancy, immunocompromised, etc), Comorbidities (HTN, Asthma, etc), Complications (Cardiac, Neuro, Respiratory) Care Process (screening, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, follow-up)

This will allow for a better search/browse experience (faceted search) and allows for an asset to be characterized along multiple axes.

Jane Shellum

 

Are resource management and logistics the same?

 

Jane Shellum

 

  • No labels