2020-09-28 Authoring Meeting Agenda and Notes

1

x

@Cary Paul

Pivotal Insight, LLC.

2

Ken Rubin

Univ of Utah

3

x

Linda Chan

Pivotal Insight, LLC.

4

x

Dhruv Sharma

ACEP

5

x

John Svirbely

Trisotech

6

Shane McNamee

Perspecta

7

Tracie Berardi

OMG

8

Pawan Goyal

ACEP

9

x

Mike Cesino

 Visible Systems Corporation

10

x

Mike Meier

11

Nathan Vafaie

ACEP

12

Davide Sottara

Mayo Clinic

13

Ken Allgood

 HealthFlow

14

Peter Haug

15

Eduardo Jeremia

16

x

Steve White

BPM Advantage

17

James McClay

UNMC

18

Bruce Bray

Univ Utah, HSC

19

x

Robert Lario

Univ Utah

20

Lorraine Constable

Book Zurman

21

x

Lloyd Dugan

22

x

Zuzana Srostlik

23

x

Denis Gagne

1. Connection, Agenda/Objectives (5 min);

2. Current, Outstanding, Backlog (20 min);

   1. Topics:
      i. September Session updates, takeaways, feedback on Clinical Shareable Pathways presentation;
      ii. Splinter Group Updates

   2. Prioritization: i. Most important; ii. Low hanging fruit; iii. Conditional (if time, what?);

3. Modeling Deeper Dive (30 min);

   1. Clinical Shareable Pathways;

   2. Other models;

4. Pattern Page Update for Authoring Guide (25 min);

   1. Value in Patterns? Feedback and Input;

   2. Rating system with the content? Priority status and scope;

   3. Use one as example to try out;

   4. Review;

5. New/Upcoming Topics; (5 min);

   1. Identify;

6. Actions and Next Steps; (5 min);

   1. Review;

1. Current, Outstanding, Backlog

2. Modeling Deeper Dive

3. Pattern Guide Update for Authoring Guide

   1. Value in Patterns? Feedback and Input;

      1. Recurring themes

      2. Allows for templates as sub-modules

      3. More standardized, modular development

      4. easier to implement and maintain; no need to reinvent the wheel

      5. Need to work on package for discovery, KPMN should be mechanism for sharing and discovering

      6. Currently text, will be more interactive in KPMN; actually see the models;

      7. Currently an appendix in the Field Guide; size issues with the Pattern Guide because of the volume/bulk - to be stored in reference

   2. Rating system with the content? Priority status and scope;

      1. May have brilliant but inaccessible to avg user; standardized and modular addresses this

      2. System or visualization to rate what type of model or pathway, to help users

      3. Two axis visualization, x= accessibility vs y= scope

      4. how to funnel feedback to modify, how to say if it is mature or accessible

      5. question - how many models will be identified? this may effect need for rating system

   3. New fields

      1. meta

      2. related - overlap of relationships; how are patterns related to each other

   4. Use one as example to try out;

   5. Review;

4. New/Upcoming Topics

   1.  

5. Actions and Next Steps

   1. Review Patterns on Confluence Folder, the 8, are they still relevant or should they be modified

   2. Modeling Conversation