Metadata Set
Date | Activity | Status Update(s) | Owner(s) |
|---|---|---|---|
2020/04/20 | Version 0.2 of Metadata based on telecon revisions | ||
2020/04/21 | Added Metadata revisions to spreadsheet | ||
2020/04/23 | Updated Spreadsheet based on group call; Revised metamodel | ||
2020/04/27 | Updated Spreadsheet based on group call | ||
2020/04/29 | Updated Spreadsheet based on group call; revised metamodel graphic source and PDF. | ||
2020/04/30 | Updated Spreadsheet based on call | ||
2020/05/01 | Updated spreadsheet with Jane’s contribution and comments | ||
2020/05/04 | Updated spreadsheet from call | ||
Model Comments
Comment/suggestion | Rationale (if necessary) | Submitter | Adjudication |
|---|---|---|---|
Consider looking at Dublin Core metadata standard | We’re a standards organization… | Jane Shellum |
|
Consider changing “area of interest” to “subject” | “subject” may be a more accurate description of what the metadata is capturing. And this is one element from Dublin Core | Jane Shellum |
|
Consider breaking down Area of interest into groups. E.g Care Setting (inpatient, outpatient, emergency, long-term care, home, telemedicine), Special Populations (children, pregnancy, immunocompromised, etc), Comorbidities (HTN, Asthma, etc), Complications (Cardiac, Neuro, Respiratory) Care Process (screening, diagnosis, treatment, prevention, follow-up) | This will allow for a better search/browse experience (faceted search) and allows for an asset to be characterized along multiple axes. | Jane Shellum |
|
Are resource management and logistics the same? |
| Jane Shellum |
|