| Table of Contents |
|---|
Date
2 July 2020
Previous Meeting - Next Meeting
Agenda
Item / Topic | Presenter | Description |
|---|---|---|
Review SDMN issues |
Participants
Goals
List goals for this meeting (e.g., Set design priorities for FY20):
Review latest metamodel structural and content changes
Identify next steps
Notes (raw)
Agenda Items:
Discuss Last week's meeting
Review CMMN Case File Items
Add Harmonization Section?
Parent/Child relationship – and continue next week
OMG Meeting notes
Going to the AB in Sep
BA MM is still slogging it out
Are there different vendor perspectives?
If yes, then RFP
SCE?
No problems
Harmonization Issue Section in Spec?
Also submit issues to OMG JIRA
Add a Style guide to aid harmonization of models (besides the Field Guide)?
Example: Harmonize Various ItemKinds
Case file trumps other models
The section, if included will be Informative - Not normative
Dealing with metaDefinitionRef for DataItems
White box item
Schema
Gray or black box
Container vs aggregate
Can properties be simple
A flattening strategy. Fully qualified name from the structure
Vendor Work in the UI
and/or
Vendor Work in the mapping
Compliance level ?
Lay out the alternatives and then send out a poll
Need Vendors on the decision
Present them to community
Local properties in BPMN
Until people complain about it, then ignore in SDMN
Modular data items
CMMN latched on to CMIS
Contain
Vs reference
Decision Camp this week
There was interest in SDMN
Red Hat is all in at KPMN and SDMN
ItemDefinition brought the minimum set of data logic definition
Lloyd Alarmed at some of the models last week
Sub-Process across lanes
Chat Log
There were no chat items on this call.
Action items
Add action items to close the loop on open questions or discussion topics:
...
- Lay out the alternatives for dealing with mapping to CMMN Properties and then send out a poll
| Anchor | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
...