Agenda Item | Lead | Minutes |
---|
| Cary | |
| Tracie | Tracie notes BPM Workshop end of March Maturity model and playbook ACTION: determine what/if we want to contribute? Decision by next session;
|
| Cary, Davide | what to include who to develop
|
| Davide, John | |
| Davide, Cary | ODEF partnership with Process Automation & Enablement Group - leads and next steps; who Process Automation & Enablement Group right now? Mike Cesino to coordinate with Imp WG, sometimes Denis; Process Automation & Enablement Group (Ken Allgood and Ben Cushing); Workgroup Mtg in March? Potential Healthcare DTF;
|
| Davide, Shane | Methodology group RFPs and working groups responding to those; 2+1 areas in the Plus space, could use more BPM; situational data, packaging of complex BPM artifacts, and artifacts; three RFPs are out for response; Lario, White and Butler are leading teams to develop/contribute; those interested should reach out to leads; Call for Papers; strategies around community topics - CAC paper, what other ideas to be reviewed FYI?; focus on automation in healthcare; one doc coming from CAC; additional self-org to submit other papers in this regard; CAC and Causeway approaches; feedback and notional criteria;
|
| Mike/Ron, Denis/ John, Shane | ODEF - what are follow up actions from that; deeper dive discussion; modeling and implementation workgroups on integration of data resources; SDMN RFP - shared data models; common concepts for ODEF to apply; Authoring Patterns and data alignment with mix of applications; purpose of ODEF integrate across different data models (neutral bridge between data models with common concept); implementation workgroup discussion (work in partnership with that team) on the data binding program, approach based on neutral ground; define scopes as modelers; ODEF has been used in an EU application BIOTOPE, ODEF was one of three; this discussion also to occur with Process Automation & Enablement Group; biotope-project.eu; Consent Model Review - 5 minutes today and then deep dive next mtg; opportunity related to pattern development; ACTION: agenda, failure negative patterns; need to define boundaries on what to achieve; dealing with exceptions other than generic way; modeling the “happy” path and only addressing exceptions when uniquely specific and value-add; leave the opportunity to add patterns; deeper dive on this topic; problem solving escalation; ACTION: model ready for feedback; Clinical failure points (two separate points); IHE Connection; IHE USA, profiles and standards, testing for ONC;
|
| | |