Page Comparison

...

	Attended	Name	Affiliation
1	x	Cary Paul	Pivotal Insight, LLC.
2		Ken Rubin	Univ of Utah
3	x	Linda Chan	Pivotal Insight, LLC.
4	x	Dhruv Sharma	ACEP
5	x	John Svirbely	Trisotech
6		Shane McNamee	Perspecta
7		Tracie Berardi	OMG
8		Pawan Goyal	ACEP
9	x	Mike Cesino	Visible Systems Corporation
10	x	Mike Meier
11		Nathan Vafaie	ACEP
12		Davide Sottara	Mayo Clinic
13		Ken Allgood	HealthFlow
14		Peter Haug
15		Eduardo Jeremia
16	x	Steve White	BPM Advantage
17		James McClay	UNMC
18		Bruce Bray	Univ Utah, HSC
19	x	Robert Lario	Univ Utah
20		Lorriane Lorraine Constable	Book Zurman
21	x	Lloyd Dugan
22	x	Zuzana Srostlik
23	x	Denis Gagne

Agenda and Minutes

...

Agenda Item GotoMeeting recording and transcript

Connection, Agenda/Objectives (5 min);
Current, Outstanding, Backlog (20 min);
1. Topics:
  i. September Session updates, takeaways, feedback on Clinical Shareable Pathways presentation;
  ii. Splinter Group Updates
2. Prioritization: i. Most important; ii. Low hanging fruit; iii. Conditional (if time, what?);
Modeling Deeper Dive (30 min);
1. Clinical Shareable Pathways;
2. Other models;
Pattern Page Update for Authoring Guide (25 min);
1. Value in Patterns? Feedback and Input;
2. Rating system with the content? Priority status and scope;
3. Use one as example to try out;
4. Review;
New/Upcoming Topics; (5 min);
1. Identify;
Actions and Next Steps; (5 min);
1. Review;

Meeting Notes

Current, Outstanding, Backlog
Modeling Deeper Dive
Pattern Page Guide Update for Authoring Guide
1. Value in Patterns? Feedback and Input;
  1. Recurring themes
  2. Allows for templates as sub-modules
  3. More standardized, modular development
  4. easier to implement and maintain; no need to reinvent the wheel
  5. Need to work on package for discovery, KPMN should be mechanism for sharing and discovering
  6. Currently text, will be more interactive in KPMN; actually see the models;
  7. Currently an appendix in the Field Guide; size issues with the Pattern Guide because of the volume/bulk - to be stored in reference
2. Rating system with the content? Priority status and scope;
  1. May have brilliant but inaccessible to avg user; standardized and modular addresses this
  2. System or visualization to rate what type of model or pathway, to help users
  3. Two axis visualization, x= accessibility vs y= scope
  4. how to funnel feedback to modify, how to say if it is mature or accessible
  5. question - how many models will be identified? this may effect need for rating system
3. New fields
  1. meta
  2. related - overlap of relationships; how are patterns related to each other
4. Use one as example to try out;
5. Review;
New/Upcoming Topics
Actions and Next Steps
1. Review Patterns on Confluence Folder, the 8, are they still relevant or should they be modified
2. Modeling Conversation

Next Mtgs:

Thursday, Oct 1, 12:00-1:00 PM BPM+Health Authoring Clinical Steering Committee

...