Jul 11, 2019 - Use Case Working Group
- Stephen White (Unlicensed)
Owned by Stephen White (Unlicensed)
Date
11 July 2019
Previous Meeting - Next Meeting
Agenda
Item / Topic | Presenter | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Continue review of proposed extensions to Item /wiki/spaces/BPMPLUS/pages/420970781 | Stephen White (Unlicensed) | Walk through metamodel proposal |
| Review some notational /wiki/spaces/BPMPLUS/pages/420937838 | Stephen White (Unlicensed) | Walk through example diagrams |
| Discuss sub-data element issue | Stephen White (Unlicensed) | Walk through example diagrams |
Participants
Goals
List goals for this meeting (e.g., Set design priorities for FY19):
- Address any Situational Data Requirements from the Field Guide and OMG Meetings
Discussion all comments on the Item Definition update proposal
- Update document as appropriate
- Identify next steps
Notes (raw)
Looking at the notation for SDMN
how does it compare to FHIR data structures?
The data structures are separate things, but there can (will) be mappings from a process data object to a service task implementation with a FHIR service.
This is a consumer action, not a producer action.
I opened a request for feedback on notational options:
- open canvas mechanism with connector lines between boxes
- structured canvas where the relationships are not shown with connectors
- graphical icons will show the types of the data elements (e.g., text, number, etc.)
The graphical options are presented /wiki/spaces/BPMPLUS/pages/420937838.
Comments and questions are welcome...
We cut the call short after 30 minutes since there was no more discussion.
Chat Log
There was no chat log during the meeting
Action items
Add action items to close the loop on open questions or discussion topics:
- enter action item