Aug 1, 2019 - Use Case Working Group
Date
1 Aug 2019
Previous Meeting - Next Meeting
Agenda
Item / Topic | Presenter | Description |
---|---|---|
Discuss sub-data element issue | Stephen White (Unlicensed) | Look at options and vote on approach |
Continue review of proposed extensions to Item /wiki/spaces/BPMPLUS/pages/420970781 | Stephen White (Unlicensed) | Walk through metamodel proposal |
Review some notational /wiki/spaces/BPMPLUS/pages/420937838 | Stephen White (Unlicensed) | Walk through example diagrams |
Participants
Stephen White (Unlicensed); John Svirbely (Unlicensed); Ken Lord; Denis Gagne; Peter Haug; Sharnita Riley
Goals
List goals for this meeting (e.g., Set design priorities for FY19):
- Address any Situational Data Requirements from the Field Guide and OMG Meetings
Discussion all comments on the Item Definition update proposal
- Update document as appropriate
- Identify next steps
Notes (raw)
We answered a few questions about some enumerations items.
We reviewed the new class call "Data Item" that reflects the BPM+ data elements (BPMN Data Object; CMMN Case File Item; and DMN Data Input).
The SDMN DataItem would be the centralized version of these other data elements. Modelers would create SDMN DataItems and the copy them into the other models.
There was some feedback that Data Item might be confusing for some practitioners.
We can change the name, but we do want the name to be consistent with the other BPM+ data related elements.
Please add comments about other names.
There was some discussion that SDMN should not just cover the logical data elements (as is in the BPM+ specs), but also consider the conceptual data models.
It was thought that the Semantic References would be a connection to external conceptual models, but Shareable Clinical Pathway production models would be at the logical level.
Chat Log
There were no chat items on this call.
Action items
Add action items to close the loop on open questions or discussion topics:
- enter action item